« The State of Texas Refuses to Block Municipal Broadband | Main | Texas Sets Key Precedent for Other States in Refusing to Ban Municipal Wireless »

March 24, 2005

Texas Two Step - Backwards

After seeing the pro-incumbent, anti-muni wireless, anti-competition language removed from the language proposed by the telecommunications committee in the Texas House, it popped up again as a last minute amendment on the House floor.    The member who reintroduced the language, Robert Puente, happens to serve in a district where an extremely large telecommunications company has its headquarters nearby.

 

While this amendment has some compromises thanks to few enlightened house members, no one has still answered the question why we are wasting taxpayer time and money building protection for companies that are near monopolies already.  You can only assume that these state representatives have no clue how important broadband is to the livelihood of their citizens, their cities, their state, and this nation. 

There are two places where this could hopefully be corrected.  First, in the Texas Senate, and then lastly with the Governor’s line item veto.  And remember, this is only one state.  This battle is being waged in many, many states across the nation. 

Interestingly, here is a new one:  A state Senator in West Virginia  has introduced a bill to "protect" and encourage muni-wireless.  That's a great idea for other states. 

It is shocking that these local reps really don’t care if broadband deployment in America continues to fall further and further behind the rest of the world.  Just shocking.

Posted by Bill Gurley on March 24, 2005 at 10:24 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834202a5153ef00d83422bd9a53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Texas Two Step - Backwards:

» Texans Against Broadband? from TexasBug
Believe it or not, our "beloved" state legistlators are trying to enact legislation that would ban municipal wireless broadband networks. Why? To protect the big telecom companies who want to charge you for their service, of course! Hat tip to Above ... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 5, 2005 7:31:48 PM

Comments

Interesting article. is there any update on this issue?

Posted by: EQ2 Gold | Feb 1, 2006 5:56:00 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

DISCLOSURE: The information contained Above the Crowd has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not necessarily complete, and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. The author is a general partner of Benchmark Capital, a venture capital firm in Menlo Park, Calif. Benchmark Capital and its affiliated companies and/or individuals may have economic interests in the companies discussed herein. © J. William Gurley 2005-2006. All rights reserved.